Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: ComputerVoltageSources

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: Software framework

From: "djbrow54" <davebr@...>
Date: 2006-03-11

I don't care so much whether there are goto's or not. I do appreciate
comments, however. I've picked up some of other people's code with
literally no comments. Pretty hard to figure out, adapt, and enhance.

As to performance, this thing is pretty zippy. I wouldn't worry too
much about speed. And, someday maybe we can figure out how to get the
assembly mode to work.

Dave

--- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh"
<michaelmarsh@...> wrote:
> So, just to start the conversation, I vote to keep the main loop as
> small as possible through the use of subroutines and functions.
> Don't use goto if you can avoid it. I realize the performance
> issues here, but unless it is absolutely clear that the stack
> overhead is hindering an algorithm, I suggest modularity. Both
> for readability and standardization purposes.