What email system is at risk with such small bandwidth here?
I use threading here and there... I still prefer the linear, read them as they come in and expect a hi-jacked thread... (real good at that myself)...
Yahoo seems more than able to achieve fine. I store digests of the groups I own and moderate for those who need to search. I even have a running digest of a group the owners like to remove message they feel are not suitable to their ends. ;-) Sometimes the data in those post is the good stuff...
each to their own...
dale
admin@...Lancaster CA
Great group to talk about all things
musical @
signature_riffs_of_the_pros-subscribe@yahoogroups.comband web pages
Inquisitor Betrayer
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/7/inquisitorbetrayermusic.htmAngel's Wings
http://www.soundclick.com/angelswings ----- Original Message -----
From: DM
To: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [AN1x] 70's/80's disco violin sound (nettiquette enzovoort)
DM weer schreef:
wow...lighten up...the only impact not editing your
emails has is on archive space. These are miniscule
text files and put minimum stress on bandwidth for any
email system.
I often purposely don't edit my emails...not "borne
out of laziness" meneertje and not to annoy you, but
because not everone uses the threading feature in the
email. IF you put the reply at the top of the email,
allowing everyone to quickly spot the new info/query,
and leave the relevant old info down below for easy
reference, it works just fine. For working with
disparate email systems and users it's a nice logical
approach.
Alas, I digress and for that I truly apologize...
let's get back to the music topic...the AN1X...which
is a FINE sounding synth...
DM schreef:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]