--- In
AN1x-list@egroups.com, "Pergamon" <pergamon@g...> wrote:
>
> > --- In AN1x-list@egroups.com, Philip <synth72@y...> wrote:
> > > Care to back that up with substance as to why it's a
> > > better synth? All you've said is that it's better, but
> > > not why it's better. I'm not trying to start an
> > > arguement. I'm just curious as to what you see in it
> > > that makes it "better".
>
> The question here was intended for me, not the "dude" that spammed
this list, just to promote himself.
Oh, you are right, sorry, i thought that Philip were asking
the "Dude" and not you.
Regards, Tom