previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
> I was thinking more about there JV/XV/XP synths and modules. Thetechnology
> may be kinda old, but it still sounds good. And the pros love it. EverThat's probably coz Yamaha only real controler is the old KX88 (as far as I
> noticed that you always see Roland on stage and in the studio? And, while
> we're at it, hardly any Yamaha?
> The Z1 is way much more than a VA synth. As a matter of fact, it's thefirst
> available polyphonic physical modelling synth (the Yamaha VP1 was notBut it's not an user-friendly synth when you're going to program it (I
> available). You can take a modelled violin in oscillator 1 and a modelled
> analogue in oscillator 2. Try that with any other synth.
> And the workstation concept comes from Korg: after all, the M1 is theirsas
> well. The Trinity and Triton are further improvements on that concept,I must agree w/ you.
> meanwhile bringing new features. (The Trinity can be expanded to a whole
> studio-in-a-box.)
> Calling Korg "not innovative" is, in my opinion, unfair and biased.Like Roland and Yamaha they've made a reliable "engine" and keep doing some
> > Hey but something has to be said for a company that takes risks. ThoughIf I start to wish to have the complete Yamaha's line up they will face the
> they're
> > huge anyway and have been around for 113 years, so it's not like they're
> gonna
> > go bankrupt anyway.
>
> Not likely. But the ironic thing is that their most down-to-earth products
> sell like crazy. The CS series, the 01V, and all the other stuff that they
> make - take, for instance, all their accoustic pianos.