<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 14.11.2021 um 21:08 schrieb Tom Wiltshire <<a href="mailto:tom@electricdruid.net" class="">tom@electricdruid.net</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta charset="UTF-8" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">So with a bit more “oomph” in the support processors, the DX7 could have been multitimbral? Interesting possibility!</span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">The algorithm yes, but what about all the other parameters? Could these have different values for the 16 notes too?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The DX7II was duo-timbral, BTW. And the TX802 (the sort-of rack version of the DX7II) was even 8-fold multitimbral. Did they have the same chips for sound generation as the original DX7?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ingo</div></body></html>