<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 22 Apr 2018, at 4:15 AM, Mattias Rickardsson <<a href="mailto:mr@analogue.org" class="">mr@analogue.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Roboto, system-ui, -apple-system, system-ui, '.SFNSText-Regular', Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); display: inline !important; float: none;" class="">The multiplier is a great idea actually, both useful and fun. I remember the "x2" button on the good old Boss DE-200 tends to be used a lot.</span></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Absolutely, like my Roland SDE 1000 similar function, because it gives you musically relevant effects. I think this would be more valuable than a numerical range. External control of the multiplier might be cool too, allowing octave jumps et al ;-)</div><br class=""></body></html>