<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 13, 2018, at 11:17 PM, Neil Johnson <<a href="mailto:neil.johnson71@gmail.com" class="">neil.johnson71@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">4 - distortion performance generally better than the original parts.</span><br style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""></div></blockquote></div>I saw their CEO claim this in a NAMM video and the datasheet claims it, but then specs .025% THD which is .005% worse than the ssm2164 and V2164. I also compared a few of the graphs to see if there was a particular context in which it was improved but I did not find one.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">That has me wondering how it works!</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">epk</div></body></html>