<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
> Kicad might be worth looking into. It's reliable, easy to
work with <br>
<br>
Reeeeally?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.reddit.com/r/KiCad/comments/41n6c6/i_want_to_love_kicad/">https://www.reddit.com/r/KiCad/comments/41n6c6/i_want_to_love_kicad/</a><br>
<br>
If that's a good sampling of the GUI's typical "design" choices,
"braindead" (like the guy called it in the last post) seems an apt
label.<br>
(alone that going back to center all the time when zooming,
warrants some HARD lashes on the butt)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 25.07.2017 um 21:21 schrieb Gordonjcp:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20170725192115.GA18358@ilyushin" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 07:37:37PM +0100, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:paula@synth.net">paula@synth.net</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've heard nothing but good things about it.
I'm tempted to look into it some more as Eagle is getting a bit pricey.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Kicad might be worth looking into. It's reliable, easy to work with,
doesn't lock your drawings up in proprietary file formats and you can't
argue with the price.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>