<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div>I'm to lazy to download the PDF but here is the reference:</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><a href="https://www.midi.org/specifications/item/bluetooth-le-midi">https://www.midi.org/specifications/item/bluetooth-le-midi</a></div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Using MIDI over BT also opens up for interaction with other devices like tablets, computers etc. </div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">//Per<br>
<br>
Skickat från min iPhone</div>
<div><br>
25 maj 2017 kl. 07:57 skrev "<a href="mailto:rsdio@audiobanshee.com">rsdio@audiobanshee.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:rsdio@audiobanshee.com">rsdio@audiobanshee.com</a>>:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>Hey Quincas,</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>MIDI is not limited to 128 steps!</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Pitch Bend always has 16384 steps, and there are 32 Continuous Controllers with both MSB and LSB for 16384 steps. Mod Wheel is one of those 32 CC numbers. Across all 16 channels, that makes a total of 528 controls on a single MIDI cable that each have
16384 steps. This is all standard MIDI 1.0 specification.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>I'm not familiar with MIDI over Bluetooth with regard to latency or any limitations in resolution that might be specific to Bluetooth, but I don't see how MIDI resolution could be any different over Bluetooth than any other medium.</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Brian Willoughby</span><br>
<span>Sound Consulting</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>On May 24, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Quincas Moreira <<a href="mailto:quincas@gmail.com">quincas@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Thanks Justin. I'd like to build something from the ground up, with hopefully way better resolution than 128 steps, but thanks for joining in on the brainstorming :)</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Justin Herrmann <<a href="mailto:ebn303afxcut@email.com">ebn303afxcut@email.com</a>> wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Hey Quincas,</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Roland's A-01 sound module can receive MIDI over Bluetooth LE. I'm not sure what the data rate is. You could turn CVs into pitch bend or mod wheel MIDI messages maybe.
</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Just spitballing.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Justin </span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 05/24/2017, 6:42 PM John Speth <<a href="mailto:john.speth@andrews-cooper.com">john.speth@andrews-cooper.com</a>> wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I’d pick Bluetooth SPP because that’s what I know and it’s really cheap now. I recently used the inexpensive Wifi based Particle module. It’s really idiot proof. I’m not sure if you can transmit module to module with Particle.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>No matter what you pick, latency will be a nuisance. I hope your application can tolerate it because digital wireless is neither temporally fast nor accurate. It’s a good case for choosing custom analog wireless but I don’t know
what is available in that area.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>JJS</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>From: Synth-diy [<a href="mailto:synth-diy-bounces@synth-diy.org">mailto:synth-diy-bounces@synth-diy.org</a>] On Behalf Of Quincas Moreira</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:14 PM</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>To: synth-diy mailing list <<a href="mailto:synth-diy@synth-diy.org">synth-diy@synth-diy.org</a>></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Subject: [sdiy] wireless patching</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Hey friends!</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>If you were to design a fast and precise wireless transmission and reception system for eurorack, how would you doi it? Synth 1 > ADC > uP > Bluetooth > uP > DAC > synth 2 ? Or is there a simple analog way to do it with RF?</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I mainly want to send control signals, but as we know, those can be up in the audio frequencies or higher!</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>The idea is to have like, 4 systems set up on 4 corners of a room and inter-patch them without stretching long cables all over the place. I think 8 sends and 8 receives on each remote patch box would suffice, and some system to
match sends to receives.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Synth-diy mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Synth-diy@synth-diy.org">Synth-diy@synth-diy.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy">http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>