<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Ok good to know</div><div id="AppleMailSignature">LTspice was the first OS X spice I had tried and yes...it's weird to get used to </div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Thnx <br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:41 PM, Walker Shurlds <<a href="mailto:walkershurlds@gmail.com">walkershurlds@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div>I'm actually about 50% LTspice via wine in Debian and 50% ngspice right now. Ngspice (which is terminal only, so I assume there's a way to get OSX to handle it) because I like to be able to invoke it when I'm ssh'd into my main box, and also in theory I can write bash scripts that invoke it (which of course had never happened). And also because LTSpice has some really bizarre quirks (undo is F9, seriously?) despite being really powerful.</div>
<div><div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Anyway, I think LTSpice might have a steeper learning curve than others because of quirks but now that I already have a billion models I downloaded that I know it's happy with I'm probably stuck with it.</div>
</div></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Walker</div>
<div class="mailbox_signature"><br></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><p></p>On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Justin Herrmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ebn303afxcut@email.com" target="_blank">ebn303afxcut@email.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><p></p><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>I use LTSpice with OSX (w/ Wine) all the time. Linear has also come out with LTSpice specifically for OSX, but I haven't tried it yet. And LTSpice is good as a general purpose Spice simulator, not just for Linear's power ICs.<br><br>
Justin <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Dan Snazelle <<a href="mailto:subjectivity@hotmail.com">subjectivity@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
You know for more than a year now I've been using TIs online power search tools and simulators<br><br><br>
Ultimately this has still kept my from learning spice<br><br>
(As I mainly use Java based simulators when I need to try out an idea quickly )<br><br>
But after having really great conversation with a linear representative last week, i'm think I might be better off using linear's parts<br><br><br>
The main stumbling block so far has just been the decidedly non OSX rich environment of the Linear (and probrably all ) spice software ...so keyboard command oriented<br><br>
Which is fine I guess but ultimately it's all about time<br><br>
So oh experts tell me<br><br>
Will I be better off with TI or linear for figuring out power stuff ??<br><br><br>
It's obvious that for power you need better analysis tools<br><br>
So spice seems at least more open<br><br><br>
Thanks for the opinions<br><br><br><br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Synth-diy mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Synth-diy@dropmix.xs4all.nl">Synth-diy@dropmix.xs4all.nl</a><br><a href="http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy">http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy</a><br></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<p>
_______________________________________________
<br>Synth-diy mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Synth-diy@dropmix.xs4all.nl">Synth-diy@dropmix.xs4all.nl</a>
<br><a href="http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy">http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy</a>
</p><br><p></p>
</blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></body></html>