<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1250" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hi!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I am also interested on using SSM2164 as VCO chips, so more
info would be appreciated (stability, tempco). I am currently testing standard
ramp integrator VCO, but have seen some interesting designs with tri/square VCO.
What's the difference in terms of stability, tracking and overall quality? Since
I have some problems with quality saw->tri conversion, maybe it would be
worth trying tri/square version. I suppose if I use SSM2164, there would be no
need for exponential converter, since SSM2164 already has exponential control.
How is with the tri->saw conversion?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>And a small note: using SSM2164 for a tri/square VCO, there is
somehow difficult to implement linear FM.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Tadej Bozicko<BR>E-Mail : <A
href="mailto:tadej.bozicko@uni-mb.si">tadej.bozicko@uni-mb.si</A><BR>WWW :
<A
href="http://imola.uni-mb.si/~bozicko">http://imola.uni-mb.si/~bozicko</A><BR>WWW2:
<A
href="http://www.uni-mb.si/~uelelt68b">http://www.uni-mb.si/~uelelt68b</A><BR></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>>Roman Sowa wrote :</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I got ssm2164 VCA yesterday!<BR>sooner than i
expected...<BR>made triangle wave VCO with it...<BR>runs coooool...<BR>15
octaves VC :-)<BR>20 (and more) octaves VC if you don't care about
precision<BR>tracks better than i can measure (will make double vco test
later)<BR>185mV/oct at 23 deg. Celcius<BR>as for me, rather poor tempco: 6-8
cents/deg.<BR></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>