[sdiy] Roland Juno 106
brianw
brianw at audiobanshee.com
Sun Feb 11 01:42:08 CET 2024
What's "the digital part"?
I assume you're not referring to the 'Digital' part of the DCO, which you referred to as boring, although the digital master clock could have a significant affect on the sound.
There's no need to 'clone' the firmware, since that digital aspect doesn't really affect the sound.
I'm just curious what you're saying has yet to be reproduced with modern technology...
Brian
On Feb 10, 2024, at 3:50 PM, Gordonjcp <gordonjcp at gjcp.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:21:33PM +0100, René Schmitz wrote:
>> The heavy lifting is always in actually modelling some real or abstract
>> thing, with what ever your favourite clay is.
>>
>> Whether it's code, transistors, 2164s, steam powered turing machines ...
>>
>> As you say, understanding what you want to do is the important bit.
>
> See, this is exactly why no-one - not even Roland - have successfully made an emulation of the Juno 106.
>
> They've all got all hung up on emulating the very simple and boring oscillators, and the totally normal, repeatable, and predictable OTA-based ladder filters.
>
> No-one has cloned the digital part yet, which is where all the magic is.
>
> --
> Gordonjcp
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list