[sdiy] Unique sounding modules that can't have voltage control?
Adam (synthDIY)
synthdiy at adambaby.com
Fri Feb 9 23:36:39 CET 2024
These are all really interesting ideas..
> On 10 Feb 2024, at 12:26 am, Todd Sines via Synth-diy <synth-diy at synth-diy.org> wrote:
>
> There are many ancient analogue processing techniques in the time domain processing field that I would *LOVE* voltage control of, but are damn near impossible due to physics, mechanical feasibility, practicality, or finances:
>
> Voltage controlled spring reverb -- where the spring length is adjusted over time to simulate expanding space. This could be done with stepper motors on a sliding track, but you cannot increase the length of the metal in the spring, only how much which it is stretched. If you could adjust the transducers / contacts over time and "dampen" the unused portion of the spring, perhaps you could use a motorized "capo" and contact mic.
> Plate Reverb -- same problem, but replace the spring(s) with a gigantic steel plate
> Cooper Time Cube -- See this: https://www.uaudio.com/blog/cooper-time-cube-power/
> ADT/Flanging -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_double_tracking
> real, through-zero-flanging, not simulated flanging. Impossible without 2 tape decks, turntables, or CDJs playing the exact same source material at precisely the same time. The Marshall Time Modulator is 90% there, but there is a difference between The Beatles "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" (tape) or Siouxsie & the Banshees "Dear Prudence" (tape, possibly with a Boss Jet Phaser) at 1:28 vs. Bauhaus "Terror Couple Kill Colonel" (Marshall Time Modulator)
>
> Todd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20240210/c5695517/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list