[sdiy] Qspice, anyone tried it?
Mike Bryant
mbryant at futurehorizons.com
Mon Dec 30 12:19:21 CET 2024
That was probably because TI give very accurate 'deep-dive' models for their SMPS chips. I haven't compared speeds but find the things I do come up almost immediately.
________________________________
From: Synth-diy <synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org> on behalf of Ingo Debus via Synth-diy <synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
Sent: 30 December 2024 11:15
To: synth-diy at synth-diy.org <synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Qspice, anyone tried it?
Am 29.12.2024 um 22:37 schrieb Mike Bryant <mbryant at futurehorizons.com<mailto:mbryant at futurehorizons.com>>:
But I actually prefer TINA from TI.
I once tried Tina-TI, and my first impression was that simulation is way slower than in LTSpice. AFAIR simulating a simple switch-mode power supply took hours. But for a fair comparison, one should simulate exactly the same circuit in both programs (which I didn’t). Has anyone tried that?
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20241230/3f3cf536/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list