[sdiy] OT list msgs , was Re: Yamaha P50-m inner reverb effect low level issue..

Ben Stuyts ben at stuyts.nl
Tue May 30 15:30:53 CEST 2023


There was a list outage not so long ago. Mailman crashed and lots of mail was queued up. I don’t believe any mail was lost at that time. I don’t remember the date, but 23 May could have been it and it lasted for maybe half a day before I noticed it. Fortunately this happens very rarely.

I checked the e-mails for Adam specifically over the past few days and they were all delivered within ca 10 minutes. That is the usual turn-around time for sending 1154 emails.

On the other hand, every now and then a big mailhost decides they don’t like us, and refuse our emails for half an hour or up to days. I have given up on contacting them as they never respond. E.g. cox, gmx, airmail <http://airmail.net/>, cloudmark <http://cloudmark.com/>.  After a few days, sendmail gives up and the particular subscriber will lose that message. At least google and microsoft have decent postmaster tools which I can monitor.

One particular thing that I see quite often is:
- ‘a’ responds to a list message from ‘b’ and  CC:’list’. Like this message.
- ‘b’ receives response almost immediately (as it doesn’t go through the list but through a’s mailhost directly).
- ‘list’ takes a while to resend and after 10 minutes (or 3 days if you are on cox.net <http://cox.net/>) delivers it to ‘b’.
- Mail program from ‘b’ sees: hey, this is the same msgid, no need to bother the boss again.
- Confusion, because the thread looks out of sync somehow.
(But I don’t think this happened in Florian’s example.)

But please, keep on reporting these kind of things. I appreciate that, and I always take these reports seriously and start checking log files etc.

Ben


> On 29 May 2023, at 23:53, Florian Anwander <fanwander at mnet-online.de> wrote:
> 
> Benjamin Tremblays opening posting about the "Glowing diode on Casio CT-510 analog board?" took 11 hours from reaching the list to delivery from the list, ...
> 
> Received: from dropmix.synth-diy.org (localhost [127.0.1.1])
> 	by dropmix.synth-diy.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 34NBgpdf028777;
> 	Tue, 23 May 2023 13:42:53 +0200 (CEST)
> 	(envelope-from synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org <mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org>)
> Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01071502.me.com (qs51p00im-w.me.com
>  [17.57.155.5])
>  by dropmix.synth-diy.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 34N0g0nn051105
>  (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO)
>  for <synth-diy at synth-diy.org> <mailto:synth-diy at synth-diy.org>; Tue, 23 May 2023 02:42:06 +0200 (CEST)
>  (envelope-from btremblay at me.com <mailto:btremblay at me.com>)
> 
> ...while his own first response then took six minutes:
> Received: from dropmix.synth-diy.org (dropmix.synth-diy.org [37.97.216.13])
> 	by mxin-2.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QQGHC6P75zvPsP
> 	for <fanwander at mnet-online.de> <mailto:fanwander at mnet-online.de>; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:01:43 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from dropmix.synth-diy.org (localhost [127.0.1.1])
> 	by dropmix.synth-diy.org (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 34N0rppf052220;
> 	Tue, 23 May 2023 02:54:27 +0200 (CEST)
> 	(envelope-from synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org <mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org>)
> 
> 
> 
> ( I hope the HTML formatting will make it to the list).
> 
> 
> Florian
> 
> Am 29.05.23 um 02:25 schrieb Adam (synthDIY):
>> I'm getting emails out of order and missing the first email in the thread on occasion recently
>> 
>> Anyone else?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> Selling or trading? Use marketplace at synth-diy.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20230530/f7aa8528/attachment.htm>


More information about the Synth-diy mailing list