[sdiy] MIDI 2.0

[Frédéric (Opensource)]

Hi everyone.

I am also worried about these new specs.

I have not taken enough time to read all the technical
documents yet but my crude impression is they changed
a ridiculously simple and reliable protocol into something
way too convoluted and closed (registration needed).

My personal wishes were improved resolution for CC and
possibility to increase the baudrate on MIDI DIN if the
device supports it.

Let see what follows.

Fred.

Le 28/01/2020 à 12:52, paula at synth.net a écrit :
> My worry is that it needs USB currently (they've not agreed any other 
> transport layers yet), and that a lot of smaller manufacturers will 
> struggle to implement this. Alongside that, you'll need to be 
> registered with the MMA to get an ID so the CI portion will work 
> properly.
>
> Also a lot of the new features seem to have already been covered by MPE.
>
> I get that in theory this is better than 1.0, by a long way, however I 
> worry for the smaller manufacturers that this may push things too far.
>
> Paula
>
> On 2020-01-28 11:35, Neil Johnson wrote:
>> (try again...)
>>
>> I see MID 2.0 is now out:
>>
>> https://www.midi.org/articles-old/details-about-midi-2-0-midi-ci-profiles-and-property-exchange 
>>
>>
>> Neil
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 11:34, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson71 at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I see MIDI 2.0 is now out:
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20200128/afccf99d/attachment.htm>