[sdiy] Suggestions for oscillator coarse control methods?

Neil Johnson neil.johnson71 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 11:48:37 CET 2020


If you're worried about panel space and still want an electrically
simple solution, perhaps a concentric switch/pot combination:
http://www.audiomaintenance.com/acatalog/Concentric_Switches.html
Switch for octaves, pot for sub-octave tune (+/- 0.6 oct to allow a
bit of overlap).

Neil

On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 10:34, Spiros Makris <spirosmakris92 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your input.
> David that seems overkill, but I guess it depends on the workflow.
> I am leaning towards an octave switch, fine and coarse pots. This trimmer idea on the PCB is pretty good, it should be useful when tuning the v/Oct response. The digital switch system is good on paper but probably not worth the hassle. I'd rather use that surface for some extra functionality, like sync. More about that in another email, hopefully in a few days.
>
> Spiros
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020, 00:18 Mattias Rickardsson, <mr at analogue.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 15:04, Spiros Makris <spirosmakris92 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. Linear potentiometer. It can sweep continuously, which is good, but because of that is less precise. Cannot do octave switching, for ease of use or playability. Easy to nudge and detune. Cheap. Temperature coefficient of potentiometers is not always quoted. Can replace with a small potentiometer for nudge-proofing but at the cost of playability.
>>
>>
>> Do try different potentiometers with the intended knob and electrical connection. The perceived precision and playability can vary between models, lubricants, torques, etc.
>>
>> /mr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list