[sdiy] LCSC.com (branch off 8-bit MCUs, why bother?)
MTG
grant at musictechnologiesgroup.com
Sat Nov 16 07:30:48 CET 2019
I just sent half a batch of Seeed boards back because many of the 0402
resistors were wrong. That was fun. They did fix them though, all at no
cost and pretty quickly. I have to say that this thread has me looking
at JLPCB.
That $0.03 microcontroller looks too painful to use unless you are
selling 100,000 of something or else your design is super simple. I used
an EMC controller years ago that was a PIC ripoff and what a pain in the
butt that was. I'm sorry but flash, debugging, timers, interrupts, a
decent stack and communications of some kind are the bare minimum for
me. Life's too short...
On 11/15/2019 4:05 PM, ulfur hansson wrote:
> wow! that price sounds incredible... I just finished a design that i'm
> dreading to build because of high component count. the JLCPCB
> boards/assembly are OK quality?
>
> i've always used Seeed for bare pcb's with great results, but my
> experience with their smt assembly hasn't been at all that great.
> I've used gold phoenix with good results, but they are more expensive of
> course...
>
> fös., 15. nóv. 2019 kl. 14:29 skrifaði Chris McDowell
> <declareupdate at gmail.com <mailto:declareupdate at gmail.com>>:
>
> I just wanted to pop in and put in a good word for LCSC. I use
> LCSC.com <http://LCSC.com> and JLCPCB.com <http://JLCPCB.com> daily
> for work, with jlcpcb now having -insanely- great deals on low
> volume smt assembly. I'm talking 20 units covered in surface mount
> components for ~$3 a piece. jlcpcb already got all of my business
> for prototype pcbs before this service went live in the US, but now
> I get any prototype pcb for less than I would have a year ago, with
> all or most surface mount soldered. A bit of a game changer for us.
>
>
> *Chris McDowell*
> ATXLED <http://www.atxled.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Nov 15, 2019, at 12:43 PM, sleepy_dog at gmx.de
>> <mailto:sleepy_dog at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ben Stuyts wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 14 Nov 2019, at 23:04,sleepy_dog at gmx.de
>>>> <mailto:sleepy_dog at gmx.de>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ben Stuyts wrote:
>>>>> How’s $0.03 for a microcontroller? :)
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYhAGnsnO7w
>>>>> Die shot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jw5D0F008c
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way,lcsc.com <http://lcsc.com/> where this mcu came from
>>>>> is a really interesting distributer, part of the same company
>>>>> alsjlcpcb.com <http://jlcpcb.com/> (pcb manufacturer). Lots of
>>>>> cheap Chinese parts, but also e.g. ST microcontrollers for
>>>>> better prices than e.g. Farnell or Digikey. I’ve used some of
>>>>> them in production, no complaints yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben
>>>>>
>>>> Ha! :D That's slightly cheating, though, isn't it? Unrealiably
>>>> obtainable "seasonal produce" fresh from Shenzen market...
>>>> usually made for one-off rubbish products.
>>>> Or not?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believelcsc.com <http://lcsc.com/> is a reputable distributor,
>>> and the company behind those cheap MCU’s (Paduak Tech) seems to
>>> give reasonable support. There are some eevblog.com
>>> <http://eevblog.com/> forum threads where people discuss their
>>> experience with these chips. I just checked that particular MCU
>>> and it is still in stock, over 18k pcs:
>>> https://lcsc.com/product-detail/PADAUK_PADAUK-Tech-PMS150C-U06_C168658.html.
>>> It boggles the mind…
>>>
>>> For a more well known example: For a recent production run I
>>> needed 100 pcs of the STM32F103RBT6, a 64 pin Arm Cortex-M3
>>> controller. It is US$1.5348 at lcsc, and USD 4.83 at Digikey.
>>> There is some sort of supply chain advantage there…
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>> Ok, this is interesting. In general, not for me personally (wrt
>> applicability). Those seem more primitive than I was aware still
>> exist, if I read that right you need to chose whether it comes
>> with an arm OR a leg ;) Which would be just right for what Richie
>> B. mentioned, e.g. electric toothbrush, I get it. Wasn't even
>> aware those had MCUs now... But I guess one step to be "ahead"
>> (marketing wise anyway) of the competition at some point in their
>> evolution was to give toothbrushes more than one function, and as
>> soon as it has that, some simple MCU like that comes in handy. (or
>> if the charging logic can also ditch some "traditional" components
>> if a MCU is present, then it's benefitial even earlier?)
>>
>> So, I guess my perception of 8 bit MCUs fading away comes from
>> seeing a lot of areas where there once were king, and anything
>> better prohibitively expensive, and nowadays those fields that I
>> am more aware of tend not to be so focused anymore on "lowest end
>> MCU possible" (again, from industrie examples I stumble upon,
>> which is biased by my particular, if not peculiar, set of
>> interests, I guess)
>>
>> So to summarize, my perception is still that they are becoming
>> less used in some areas (and IF my perceived trend continues, the
>> end point there is "phased out"), but now through this thread I
>> have become aware of areas that weren't on my radar at all before,
>> so thanks for that, to all involved.
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org <mailto:Synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org <mailto:Synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
>
> --
> •
> ulfurhansson.com <http://ulfurhansson.com/>
> cargocollective.com/ulfur <http://cargocollective.com/ulfur>
> instagram.com/ulfur_ <http://instagram.com/ulfur_>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list