[sdiy] Standard markings for modular I/O & CV versus Audio?

[John Staapel]

Look at the old Fenix   https://www.dutchsynth.nl/FenixXL.html   or the new
fenix
http://www.synthanatomy.com/2019/05/tinrs-announced-fenix-iv-monster-modular-synth.html

Op vr 20 dec. 2019 om 05:35 schreef <rsdio at audiobanshee.com>:

> Hello all,
>
> I seem to recall that some brands of modular utilize a consistent set of
> markings for Inputs, Outputs, CV (DC) & Audio (AC or DC). There’s also
> sometimes the convention that inputs are on top, and outputs are on the
> bottom, but that seems difficult to stick to for all kinds of modules.
>
> It seems nice to be able to glance at a front panel and know right away
> which jacks are outputs, which are inputs, which can accept CV and/or audio.
>
> What conventions exist? Are there conflicting conventions? Is it hopeless?
>
> Thanks for any input (as long as you label the inputs),
>
> Brian Willoughby
>
> p.s. I just designed a one-off module that I thought was going to include
> a set of multiples. However, I’ve now learned that I need to make these
> active, so I have to designate which jacks are inputs versus outputs. I’ve
> already ordered the face plate for this one, but I’m still thinking of how
> I might have changed the labeling to reflect active versus passive.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20191220/81f14871/attachment.htm>