[sdiy] Roland's cross mod and metal sync
Tom Wiltshire
tom at electricdruid.net
Tue Aug 27 20:19:53 CEST 2019
It’s the Metal Sync that I think is the most efficient. Given the DCO architecture, it’s basically free (it cost them one NAND gate in the hardware).
I don’t understand why they took that feature away in the JX-8P, especially as it looks like the hardware can do it, but I see no mention in the user manual. Has anyone done a processor upgrade for the JX-8P yet? Tell them to put Meta Sync back in!
Tom
==================
Electric Druid
Synth & Stompbox DIY
==================
> On 27 Aug 2019, at 18:46, Chris McDowell <declareupdate at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a great writeup, Tom. I spent a long train ride in Japan reading about this very thing. Their economy in the design of these features is interesting, too! In the case of the JX8P,I think I remember it was a single BJT that muted the DCO. Very cheap "cross-mod" indeed.
>
> Chris McDowell
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 27, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
>>
>> I mentioned the other day that I was working on article about Roland’s "cross modulation” and “metal sync” and what they really are.
>>
>> It turns out there are three different generations of Roland synths that each use the “Cross mod” terminology differently. Only the second generation DCO-based instruments have the Metal Sync feature. Full details here:
>>
>> https://electricdruid.net/roland-cross-mod-metal-sync/
>>
>> Any corrections, comments, or feedback are always appreciated. I’ve only just got this into a reasonable condition, so I don’t suppose it’s perfect just yet!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>> ==================
>> Electric Druid
>> Synth & Stompbox DIY
>> ==================
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list