[sdiy] samplers & pitch shifting

Vladimir Pantelic vladoman at gmail.com
Fri May 18 10:30:05 CEST 2018


http://synthmuseum.com/linn/linlm101.html

"'I believe the LM-1 sounded better because I didn't incorporate strict
textbook digital sampling theory. By the book, I should have filtered
out any playback frequencies above the Nyquist frequency, which is a
little less that one-half of the sampling frequency. I used a sampling
rate of around 27kHz. However, filtering on playback would have made
some of the drums sound pretty dull. Instead, I let some of the
frequencies above that point get through, because the results - which
can get distorted - sounded like the sizzle of drums anyway. Thanks to
that decision, the LM-1 sounded better than some drum machines with the
same sampling rate, because it had the highs. In a sense, I'm thankful
that I wasn't very good at the engineering.'"

:)


On 18.05.2018 09:28, Gordonjcp wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:22:18PM -0700, rsdio at audiobanshee.com wrote:
>> Agreed. … with both Gordon and Paula.
>>
>> Besides, if you’re aiming anywhere near “vintage” drum machine technology, then you certainly should avoid the kind of sample manipulation that pitch shifting performs. k.i.s.s.
> 
> The classic Linndrum didn't even really have much in the way of
> reconstruction filtering, allowing the digital steppyness to give the
> samples some of the top end they were missing.
> 




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list