[sdiy] Pet Peeves

MTG grant at musictechnologiesgroup.com
Fri May 4 20:28:06 CEST 2018


I was looking at some SRAM recently and it was a pretty short datasheet. 
I guess they assume you've read all the earlier ones on the same type of 
device written by companies that published actual data books.

On 5/4/2018 11:17 AM, Tim Ressel wrote:
> To be fair it looks like the segment naming is pretty standard. Still it 
> would nice to have it on the sheet.
> 
> --tr
> 
> 
> On 5/4/2018 11:11 AM, Dave Magnuson wrote:
>> Now, how could that *possibly* be important.   Sheesh.
>>
>> That's a pretty big omission
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Synth-diy <synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org> On Behalf Of Tim Ressel
>> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 1:55 PM
>> To: SYNTH DIY <synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
>> Subject: [sdiy] Pet Peeves
>>
>> Who's up for a Friday rant?
>>
>> My pet peeve this morning: incomplete data sheets. I'm looking at the
>> Lite-On LTP-3862 and nowhere does it relate the segment names on the 
>> pins to
>> the segments on the display.
>>
>> -- 
>> --Tim Ressel
>> Circuit Abbey
>> timr at circuitabbey.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
> 



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list