[sdiy] DSP MIDI Synth (was Re: 566 Functional Replacement)

[Jay Vaughan]

I've been burned by Jan a couple times and he refuses to communicate with
me about the status of the DSP G1.  Funded it, got nothing back in return,
and *ZERO* communication despite multiple attempts.  I think he should get
his online manners sorted out before he gets any more money thrown his way,
personally - at least communicate about what happened.  I would've loved a
G1.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-dsp-g1-analog-modeling-synthesizer#/

j.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Michael Zacherl <sdiy-mz01 at blauwurf.info>
wrote:

> I hear you. :) I was generally speaking.
> I didn’t listen to the clips though.
>
> > On 19 Mar 2018, at 22:31, Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
> >
> > You can read the code. It responds to chords by assigning separate
> oscillators to each note, up to five. So it *is* by the usual definitions
> “paraphonic”. There’s examples of this in the demo video, if you can stand
> it.
> >
> >> On 19 Mar 2018, at 21:18, Michael Zacherl <sdiy-mz01 at blauwurf.info>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> IMHO without a keyboard and/or description of MIDI implementation you
> can’t tell what it’s meant to be anyway.
> >>
> >>> On 19 Mar 2018, at 14:43, Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, yeah, I know…but one filter, one VCA, and one set of envelopes
> is monophonic to me, even if it has got five oscillators ;)
> >>>
> >>>> On 19 Mar 2018, at 11:53, paula at synth.net wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> 5 voice paraphonic, not monophonic..
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20180320/edf64c97/attachment.htm>