[sdiy] 566 Functional Replacement
Dan Snazelle
subjectivity at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 17 20:00:15 CET 2018
Honestly now that the Cem vco is back in production , in prices lower than the 566 (especially in quantity ) I would think that chip would be a better bet.
You basically want an OSC on a chip that has multiple waveforms right ?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Tim Ressel <timr at circuitabbey.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A while ago I asked for circuit ideas to use my rare 566s in. The more I got into the suggestions the more I realized just how useful the 566 was. And the more sad I got that its gone.
>
> I am looking for a functional replacement for what the 566 used to do for us. A small, low part count vco design that covers more or less what the 566 did. I would prefer analog over digital because some uses, like noise modulation, may not work so well with a digital solution.
>
> I have looked at the 4046 design but it requires some components, especially if you want triangle output. There was a tri-core design I saw somewhere online that was real tight. I think it was a 13700 based circuit. But I can't find it now. The is the KA331 but it is DIP only.
>
> Hmm .. maybe I am out of luck.
>
> --
> --Tim Ressel
> Circuit Abbey
> timr at circuitabbey.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list