[sdiy] Filter slopes

[Scott Gravenhorst]

I wish I knew, never owned a modular...  I assume Dieter refers to Doepfer?

Ian Fritz <ijfritz at comcast.net> wrote:
>Doesnt Dieter do that with his delay units?  
>
>Ian
>
>> On Jun 11, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Scott Gravenhorst <music.maker at gte.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Also, a friend of mine, Les Hall on electro-music.com, came up with an analog way to do
>> Karplus-Strong using a BBD and a single pole low pass analog 
>filter (just RC) in the loop. > This works and might also be 
>applicable to the flute model described on ccrma.standford.com. > 
>That might be tricky to get working, but probably not impossible. 
>If I were to try it (I'm not > really an analog guy now), I'd 
>start with Les Hall's BBD KS circuit and see what the problems > 
>are with it. Another friend implemented it (BBD KS) and he said 
>it suffers the same problem > that the digital model has - the 
>low pass filter adds a bit of extra delay so it detunes a bit > 
>as the delay is shortened. Delay time is controlled by using a 
>VCO as a clock to drive the BBD. > > music.maker at gte.net wrote: 
>>> >> >> Look at Perry Cook's flute model: >> >> 
>https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/clm/compmus/clm-tutorials/pm.html#s-f 
>>> >> It's an extension of Karplus-Strong string models. There 
>are two >> delay lines, one is exactly 1/2 the length of the 
>other. The >> short one models the mouthpiece and it energizes 
>the long one. >> I've gotten it to work and it sounds VERY 
>flute-like, however, I >> still need to work on it because it 
>comes to full amplitude very >> slowly with whatever mistake I 
>made. I'm sure another look at my >> code and I'll see a doofus 
>thing I did. >> >> Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote: 
>>>> Ok, I dont know anything about coupled resonators. What >>> 
>would I look up to find out more (aside from that obvious term ), 
>>>> and how would I implement such a thing for analogue audio? 
>Making >>> resonators is easy enough. How do I couple them? >>> 
>>>> Im looking for a practical implementation with details of how 
>>>> that was arrived at, rather than a highly abstract splurge of 
>>>> math that I won't understand and which could probably be >>> 
>explained in words of two syllables or less if anyone took the 
>>>> time to bother. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tom >>> >>> 
>================== >>> Electric Druid >>> Synth & Stompbox DIY 
>>>> ================== >>> >>>> On 11 Jun 2018, at 20:50, ASSI 
><Stromeko at nexgo.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Monday, June 11, 2018 
>7:43:22 AM CEST Elain Klopke wrote: >>>>> I was reading an 
>article about the spectral content of various instruments >>>>> 
>(woodwinds and strings) and while they didn't have any circuits, 
>there were >>>>> some tables showing cutoff frequencies and high 
>and low slopes. Several of >>>>> the pictures looked like 
>bandpass filter responses with different slopes on >>>>> each 
>side. How would I go about doing that? Is the slope determined by 
>the >>>>> gain of the op amp in an active filter? If it's that 
>easy, would it be a >>>>> highpass filter followed by a lowpass 
>filter each with their own gain >>>>> settings? >>>> >>>> Both 
>woodwinds and string instruments (among others) can be modeled 
>with >>>> coupled resonators. The characteristic timbre of each 
>is related to the modes >>>> of these resonators and the transfer 
>of energy between them. The slopes of >>>> the bandpass skirts 
>depend on both the quality factor of the resonator and the >>>> 
>coupling strength to other resonators or resonator modes. 
>Generally speaking, >>>> losing energy (e.g. into another mode) 
>is a reduction in Q and hence shows up >>>> as a flattening of 
>the slope. If you just want to approximate the magnitude >>>> 
>response, a filter bank with a high enough number of filter bands 
>is as good >>>> as any other method and relatively easy to 
>implement, it just uses many de- >>>> coupled resonators instead 
>of few(er) coupled ones. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Achim. >>>> 
>-- >>>> +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk 
>Blofeld]>+ >>>> >>>> Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: >>>> 
>http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves >>>> >>>> 
>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> 
>Synth-diy mailing list >>>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org >>>> 
>http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy >>> >>> >>> 
>_______________________________________________ >>> Synth-diy 
>mailing list >>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org >>> 
>http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy >>> ? >> >> -- 
>ScottG >> 
>________________________________________________________________________ 
>>> -- Scott Gravenhorst >> -- http://scott.joviansynth.com/ >> -- 
>When the going gets tough, the tough use the command line. >> -- 
>Matt 21:22 >> >> >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> 
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Content-Disposition: inline >> 
>>> _______________________________________________ >> Synth-diy 
>mailing list >> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org >> 
>http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy >> > > -- ScottG 
>> 
>________________________________________________________________________ 
>> -- Scott Gravenhorst > -- http://scott.joviansynth.com/ > -- 
>When the going gets tough, the tough use the command line. > -- 
>Matt 21:22 > > _______________________________________________ > 
>Synth-diy mailing list > Synth-diy at synth-diy.org > 
>http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy 
>
>

-- ScottG
________________________________________________________________________
-- Scott Gravenhorst
-- http://scott.joviansynth.com/
-- When the going gets tough, the tough use the command line.
-- Matt 21:22