[sdiy] How about LM13700A?

[pata at ieee.org]

Thank you, Ian!

I understood "unnecessarily".

Taku

2017/09/12 8:09、ijfritz at comcast.net のメッセージ:

> My experience, after characterizing dozens of different units, is that they are not necessarily better.  Batch-to-batch variations dominate performance.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App
> 
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> 
> From: pata at ieee.org
> To: synth-diy mailing list
> Sent: September 11, 2017 at 4:28 PM
> Subject: [sdiy] How about LM13700A?
> 
> Hi List!
> 
> Did anyone experienced LM13700A?
> 
> Of course, according to the datasheet, suffix "A" type is better key 
> characteristics than that of no suffix type.
> 
> But I have never used, even on breadboard.
> 
> So please let me know how the LM13700A is better than no suffix type in 
> your project or experiments.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Taku
> 
> 
> p.s.
> 
> If it is good enough worth of +50% higher price than that of no suffix 
> type, I plan to order it for group buying.
> 
> -- 
> =========================================
> KATAYAMA, Takuya
> Muse Music Synthesizer Laboratory, Japan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170912/c588850b/attachment.htm>