[sdiy] How about LM13700A?
tom at electricdruid.net
Tue Sep 12 01:15:46 CEST 2017
No, sorry, I’ve never seen one either. All the ones I’ve used have been the standard “13700”.
Which parameters do you think offer an improvement for the ”A” suffix type. In had a look at this data sheet and could only really see that the Gm range is perhaps a little smaller. Bandwidth, crosstalk, slew rate, offset currents and many other parameters all seem to be the same. I don’t think I’d pay +50% for it.
Synth & Stompbox DIY
> On 11 Sep 2017, at 23:27, pata at ieee.org wrote:
> Hi List!
> Did anyone experienced LM13700A?
> Of course, according to the datasheet, suffix "A" type is better key characteristics than that of no suffix type.
> But I have never used, even on breadboard.
> So please let me know how the LM13700A is better than no suffix type in your project or experiments.
> If it is good enough worth of +50% higher price than that of no suffix type, I plan to order it for group buying.
> KATAYAMA, Takuya
> Muse Music Synthesizer Laboratory, Japan
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
More information about the Synth-diy