[sdiy] JFET question - Sound leak in Mesa Road King II amplifier
Barry Klein
barryklein at cox.net
Thu Sep 7 17:31:09 CEST 2017
Do you have a scope to check along the tube circuits on the first page?
The second page is effects/bypass so in bypass mode you have eliminated the fets from the picture and are left with the ones on the first page. Maybe describe the problem more.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 7:42 AM, cheater00 cheater00 <cheater00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I have one of those, what would I be looking for when testing the JFETs?
>
> Do you think they might be leaking the soubd around the circuit like i described above? (Signal chain -> JFET 1 drain -> JFET 1 Gate -> JFET 2 Gate -> JFET 2 Drain -> Signal chain later)
>
>
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:10 Barry Klein <barryklein at cox.net> wrote:
>> I don't think jfets have a body diode, but there is a max. gate current spec
>> of 50mA so a series resistor with each jfet gate might help out. Could be
>> an unexpected surge current on the drain too given so many things are being
>> switched...
>> There are these cool component testers like for 20 bucks on ebay that will
>> test these parts quickly out of circuit. I bought the American first
>> version, called the m3, and it has saved me a heck of a lot of time on
>> things like this.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cheater00 cheater00
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 6:15 PM
>> To: synth-diy mailing list
>> Subject: [sdiy] JFET question - Sound leak in Mesa Road King II amplifier
>>
>> Hi guys,
>> I've been trying to figure this one out for a year or so, but it's been
>> elusive.
>>
>> I have a Mesa Road King II tube amp. When I turn the gain all the way
>> down, there is still sound coming out. It's a slightly high-passed
>> version of the input. I even put a cable into the effect loop return,
>> with the other end of the cable disconnected - and sound was still
>> coming through. The cable should have made sure no audio comes through
>> from the peramp and input. Yet I still get room level output when the
>> head is connected to a Mesa oversized 4x12.
>>
>> At first I thought it might have been the tubes coupling via their
>> voltage rails, but I haven't really tested that idea, because
>> decoupling each tube would be expensive (in part cost) and also
>> technically complex and a huge butcher job on the PCB.
>>
>> I thought maybe the capacitors have dried out, but they seem ok-ish,
>> maybe a wee bit swollen, but they just might have been manufactured
>> that way.
>>
>> I stumbled upon this video today, with a guy debugging an issue in a
>> Roadster, which is a scaled down Road King:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kNMtOmT76U
>>
>> here he works on the JFETs used for muting the sound. Turns out he
>> shorted some pads on one of them and that made the whole amp silent.
>>
>> Here are the relevant sections of the RKII schematics:
>> https://imgur.com/a/astMS
>>
>> You will see some J175's connecting from the signal chain to ground,
>> with the gate seemingly disconnected. All those gates are tied
>> together and connected to the pop reduction circuit ("mute circuit",
>> seen in the third diagram on the bottom right). The RKII uses a lot of
>> relays, and when they switch, normally there would be a loud pop in
>> the output - so during that time, the J175's momentarily short the
>> signal to ground, to make sure the pop doesn't propagate (and possibly
>> sustain due to built in spring reverb or outboard). The J175's are
>> controlled by the 6426 in the lower right corner of the third diagram,
>> but I'm not sure how that works exactly.
>>
>> If you look at the comments of the video, you will see user mrkv4k
>> comments on the way the J175s are used. He says they are bound to be
>> damaged because the internal (parasitic) body diode gets biased too
>> much in this design. As a consequence, those JFETs die often and often
>> need to be replaced. And it is true, they often get replaced by the
>> techs. I didn't fully understand his explanation of using N-channel
>> transistors instead of P-channel. Could someone explain this to me?
>> Here are the comments:
>>
>> """
>> mrkv4k:
>> > This is the weirdest design with JFETs I have ever seen. IMHO they are
>> > literary boud to malfunction at some point, because the method they
>> > choosed to switch them On is just wrong!
>> > You should never use low impedance to ground to switch p-chanel JFETs,
>> > because this way, they are gonna be damaged every time it's drain gets
>> > above 1V.
>> > If you wanna ensure that they won't be damaged, and you don't wanna
>> > rebuild the mute circuit with PNP instead of 6426, add one 4k7 resistor
>> > between R128 and colector of NPN 6426 (on the transistor side).
>>
>> The Guitologist:
>> > Maybe there's a job at Mesa in your future.
>>
>> mrkv4k:
>> > I doubt that :D I am thousands of miles away and I design HW for acces
>> > control systems (mostly RFID time-clocks). Building Tube amps is just a
>> > hobby.
>> > I think that the problem is that more and more engineers design with some
>> > simulation programs and they don't test extreme conditions on the real
>> > thing. And some engineers are not aware of the fail-modes of basic
>> > components, like with those JFETs, you learn how it works under standard
>> > conditions (applying positive voltage on gate of p-JFET is going to
>> > "shrink" the conductive channel), but ommit the non-standard conditions
>> > (if you look at the schematic of JFET, there is an arrow on the gate,
>> > which is actual "parasitic"/body diode that shouldn't be ever polarized in
>> > conducting direction - and that is what can happen in this design).
>>
>> The Guitologist:
>> > You would know better than I. I appreciate you sharing your expertise
>> > here. Something to chew on for sure. So your suggested mod for this Mesa
>> > Boogie Mute Circuit would be to add one 4k7 resistor between R128 and
>> > colector of NPN 6426 (on the transistor side)? And this should lengthen
>> > the life of the JFETs?
>>
>> mrkv4k:
>> > Yes, if the problem is what I think it is, than it will help protect those
>> > JFETs. Also, I checked the numbers once more and I think 470R would be
>> > better, since that is sufficient to supress that effect and it won't slow
>> > down shutdown of RM2. So I would check this solution, to see if the mute
>> > circuit works fine. Other way would be to put those resistors to each
>> > gate.
>> > What I think happends is that when you try to mute while there is high
>> > signal (like when you switch on effect while playing), gates of JFETs are
>> > grounded via low resistance of that NPN transitor. Since drain is at high
>> > voltage, you will get spike of current going throught the body diode (just
>> > until it's muted). Those body diodes are small and can handle only pulse
>> > up to 50mA.
>> """
>>
>>
>> My question is: could those JFETs - even if they are in OK-ish
>> condition (remember that's a really old amp with old, possibly crappy,
>> silicon in them), could they be leaking sound from the input (see
>> first schematic diagram, just next to guitar input jack), through the
>> gate, to the common gate "rail", and then to the gate of the J175MU on
>> the very right of the second schematic diagram and subsequently
>> through that chip to the power amp (V6B grid, part of the power amp's
>> input pair)? This is all in the JFETs' "off" state, where they are
>> *not* shorting the signal path to ground.
>>
>> If I were to replace those JFETs, how could I limit this behavior?
>>
>> Here are a few ideas - please let me know if they are sound:
>> - add 470 to 4k7 resistors in series with each JFET's gate. This
>> resistor would be placed between each gate and the bus that is common
>> to all gates.
>> - in addition to that resistor, add a capacitor from the junction of
>> the resistor and the JFET's gate to ground to make sure no sound makes
>> it into the gate rail. The gate itself is mostly a DC signal so that
>> should be blocked by the capacitor, consequently arriving at the gate
>> pin of the JFET, with a rounded leading edge. (please correct me if
>> I'm wrong).
>> - use a different transistor, maybe N-channel JFET instead of
>> P-channel, but I don't know how I would do that
>>
>> I don't really know what characteristics of a JFET I would be looking
>> for. I had a stroll through the J175's data sheet (eg this one:
>> http://www.jameco.com/Jameco/Products/ProdDS/992409.pdf ) but I'm not
>> sure what number I would be looking to improve upon over what the J175
>> provides. Does anyone have tips?
>>
>> Another user commented on possible FET replacements:
>>
>> """
>> Evil Gremlin:
>> > Seen same JFET issue. Replaced with more powerful MOSFETs and adjusted
>> > gate voltage, so little static wouldn't be an issue in future. It's just
>> > pull-downs, so basically you can put anything here. JFET, MOSFET, bipolar,
>> > IGBT - whatever perverted fantasies you have :) It's just p-channels don't
>> > require any other components.
>>
>> The Guitologist:
>> > Did you have to adjust the values of the timing capacitors in the mute
>> > circuit also? If you're changing voltage, it seems you might need to in
>> > order for the mute not to last too long or too short.
>>
>> Evil Gremlin:
>> > Nope, got lucky. Well, in theory mute time became slightly longer, because
>> > of higher gate capacitance, but not noticeably :)
>> """
>>
>> Not sure how to select a transistor like this. How would I make sure
>> the transistor is a drop-in replacement and doesn't need me to change
>> the timing capacitors? Would I look for the same gate capacitance as
>> J175? Some other thing? What did The Guitologist mean with changing
>> voltage?
>>
>> Thanks a lot. Any tips would be highly appreciated!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170907/ade7265c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list