[sdiy] free AS3320, AS3340, AS3310 and AS3360 samples

[Tom Wiltshire]

That sounds like a challenge! I hope we’re all up for it!

Tom

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 03:05, Ģirts Ozoliņš <ggg at fgi.lv> wrote:
> 
> Totally agree!
> It's not particualry exciting to use 33xx in standard/datasheet connection. Let's see who will come up with something totally out of the box! :)
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> Girts
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Synth-diy [mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org] On Behalf Of Mike HEQX
> Sent: 01 November 2017 10:31
> To: synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] free AS3320, AS3340, AS3310 and AS3360 samples
> 
> Inline with what you are saying Tom, I think it's time for new form factors as well. Why do all synths need to be in a box full of knobs and buttons, with keys in the front?
> 
> If a non-branded wholesale board became available  ( for the 3320 for example ) that could be integrated into a new design and not be a diy euro-rack module etc, that would be nice as well.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> On 10/31/2017 9:35 AM, Tom Wiltshire wrote:
>> Agree. The obvious and simplest way to get these chips and running is to put together a schematic and PCB layout for one of the CEM-based classics. I’ve heard of a Pro-One PCB in development already, several people have mentioned wanting to do the SH-101 (although that involves cloning Roland’s filter with 13700 OTAs - more tricky) and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Prophet 5 and Oberheim OB-Xa or OB-8 voices.
>> 
>> Once those boxes have been ticked, anyone who wants to get noticed is going to have to do something more interesting!
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> ==================
>>        Electric Druid
>> Synth & Stompbox DIY
>> ==================
>> 
>>> On 30 Oct 2017, at 22:11, paula at synth.net wrote:
>>> 
>>> Mattias,
>>> 
>>> Totally agree, but I suspect we will see a whole bunch of "rehash" initially, but after that, new ideas will come.
>>> 
>>> Paula
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2017-10-30 20:15, Mattias Rickardsson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 26 October 2017 at 17:42, <paula at synth.net> wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> It'll be fantastic to see what new stuff people come up with.
>>>> 
>>>> This is an important point: new stuff!
>>>> I hope that the new-old ICs will make people invent more than 
>>>> regurgitate. :-) There's such a lot of ideas not realized yet. 
>>>> Remember that the CEM/SSM products disappeared from the synths when 
>>>> they were still largely standard subtractive VCO-VCF-VCA machines. 
>>>> We have 30 years of synthesis to reinvent! ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> /mr
>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
>> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy