[sdiy] wireless patching

[Quincas Moreira]

this is the direction I'm leaning towards!

"I hope it was clear that I wasn't saying one has to use existing RC radios
and their standard sample rate (which is based on limitations of circuitry
now decades obsolete).  The same general protocol could be implemented at
a much higher sampling/repetition rate in a higher frequency band, and *if
both are implemented at the same sample rate* it's hard for a digital
packet protocol to beat it on latency." mscala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca



On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:31 AM, <mskala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 May 2017, rsdio at audiobanshee.com wrote:
> > Another issue is that the RC solution is limited to a 50 Hz sample rate,
> > whereas the digital word protocol could manage a higher sample rate -
>
> I hope it was clear that I wasn't saying one has to use existing RC radios
> and their standard sample rate (which is based on limitations of circuitry
> now decades obsolete).  The same general protocol could be implemented at
> a much higher sampling/repetition rate in a higher frequency band, and *if
> both are implemented at the same sample rate* it's hard for a digital
> packet protocol to beat it on latency.
>
> --
> Matthew Skala
> mskala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca                 People before principles.
> http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>



-- 
Quincas Moreira
Test Pilot at VBrazil Modular
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170526/52a50b0c/attachment.htm>