[sdiy] wireless patching

[John Speth]

I’d pick Bluetooth SPP because that’s what I know and it’s really cheap now.  I recently used the inexpensive Wifi based Particle module.  It’s really idiot proof.  I’m not sure if you can transmit module to module with Particle.

No matter what you pick, latency will be a nuisance.  I hope your application can tolerate it because digital wireless is neither temporally fast nor accurate.  It’s a good case for choosing custom analog wireless but I don’t know what is available in that area.

JJS

From: Synth-diy [mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org] On Behalf Of Quincas Moreira
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:14 PM
To: synth-diy mailing list <synth-diy at synth-diy.org>
Subject: [sdiy] wireless patching

Hey friends!
If you were to design a fast and precise wireless transmission and reception system for eurorack, how would you doi it? Synth 1 > ADC > uP > Bluetooth > uP > DAC > synth 2 ?  Or is there a simple analog way to do it with RF?

I mainly want to send control signals, but as we know, those can be up in the audio frequencies or higher!

The idea is to have like, 4 systems set up on 4 corners of a room and inter-patch them without stretching long cables all over the place. I think 8 sends and 8 receives on each remote patch box would suffice, and some system to match sends to receives.

--
Quincas Moreira
Test Pilot at VBrazil Modular
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170524/bc69e7c0/attachment.htm>