[sdiy] Schematics Software

[matt holland]

At least in the past free Eagle had a two page limitation which encouraged
designers to cram things into less space than they should otherwise take
for readability.

I also really dislike it's system of storing power pins in separate symbols
and the weird generic net and pin names with $ signs everywhere. Horrible
default colors as well.

mh
On May 20, 2017 11:27 AM, "Ingo Debus" <igg.debus at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > Am 20.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb David G Dixon <dixon at mail.ubc.ca>:
> >
> > They beat the hell out of Eagle
> > schematics, though (which I used to get from Dan at Intellijel, who did
> all
> > the layouts of my designs, and I found them very difficult to read).
>
> Is there something inherent to Eagle that leads to difficult to read
> schematics? I mean, you can always draw non-legible schematics, no matter
> which tool you use, but that’s not the point here.
>
> Unlike now, in earlier versions AFAIR it was not possible to move parts of
> a schematic from one page to another. If you didn’t plan carefully, this
> could lead to pretty crammed sheets. But this problem is gone now.
>
> Ingo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170521/8619368c/attachment.htm>