[sdiy] Schematics Software
David G Dixon
dixon at mail.ubc.ca
Sat May 20 19:06:17 CEST 2017
You are right. It is more of a "personal style" issue. I am a bit
obsessive about arranging schematics, and when my designs come back to me in
a different format, rearranged, it is sometimes hard for me to decipher
them.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Synth-diy [mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org] On
> Behalf Of Ingo Debus
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 8:23 AM
> To: synth-diy mailing list
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Schematics Software
>
>
> > Am 20.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb David G Dixon <dixon at mail.ubc.ca>:
> >
> > They beat the hell out of Eagle
> > schematics, though (which I used to get from Dan at Intellijel, who
> > did all the layouts of my designs, and I found them very
> difficult to read).
>
> Is there something inherent to Eagle that leads to difficult
> to read schematics? I mean, you can always draw non-legible
> schematics, no matter which tool you use, but that's not the
> point here.
>
> Unlike now, in earlier versions AFAIR it was not possible to
> move parts of a schematic from one page to another. If you
> didn't plan carefully, this could lead to pretty crammed
> sheets. But this problem is gone now.
>
> Ingo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list