[sdiy] Schematics Software

David G Dixon dixon at mail.ubc.ca
Sat May 20 19:06:17 CEST 2017


You are right.  It is more of a "personal style" issue.  I am a bit
obsessive about arranging schematics, and when my designs come back to me in
a different format, rearranged, it is sometimes hard for me to decipher
them.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Synth-diy [mailto:synth-diy-bounces at synth-diy.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ingo Debus
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 8:23 AM
> To: synth-diy mailing list
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Schematics Software
> 
> 
> > Am 20.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb David G Dixon <dixon at mail.ubc.ca>:
> > 
> > They beat the hell out of Eagle
> > schematics, though (which I used to get from Dan at Intellijel, who 
> > did all the layouts of my designs, and I found them very 
> difficult to read).
> 
> Is there something inherent to Eagle that leads to difficult 
> to read schematics? I mean, you can always draw non-legible 
> schematics, no matter which tool you use, but that's not the 
> point here.
> 
> Unlike now, in earlier versions AFAIR it was not possible to 
> move parts of a schematic from one page to another. If you 
> didn't plan carefully, this could lead to pretty crammed 
> sheets. But this problem is gone now.
> 
> Ingo
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> 




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list