[sdiy] Can anyone OCR the AN23.PDF File Here?

[Ove Ridé]

What I discussed was based on the assumption that Bernie would eventually
accept David's offer.

On Wednesday, 5 July 2017, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson71 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ove Ridé wrote:
>
>> On 5 July 2017 at 14:44, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson71 at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','neil.johnson71 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> > Because it violates copyright law.
>> >
>> > There are provisions in many country's copyright laws to allow
>> universities
>> > to scan or photocopy sections of copyrighted materials for educational
>> > purposes only.  For example:
>> > http://copyright.ubc.ca/guidelines-and-resources/copyright-guidelines/
>>
>> What's being discussed on that page are exceptions to copyright,
>> meaning that an individual may, under certain circumstances, make
>> copies of a work without permission of the copyright holder. However,
>> I don't see how that is at all applicable if a copy is made with
>> explicit permission, and even by request from the copyright owner. The
>> only potential problem I could see here is that the university might
>> object to using their equipment for what is essentially private work,
>> not related to university activities.
>>
>
> Ok, so where has Bernie given "explicit permission"...?
> Maybe I missed it.
>
> Neil
> --
> http://www.njohnson.co.uk
>


-- 
/Ove

Blog: <http://blog.gg8.se/>

"Here is Evergreen City. Evergreen is the color of green forever."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170705/ea459cd9/attachment.htm>