[sdiy] Novation peak NCOs
Andy Drucker
andy.drucker at gmail.com
Sun Apr 23 17:05:13 CEST 2017
I'm trying to understand, in the NCO architecture being discussed
(tentatively as we don't have exact details from Novation), is the choice
to use a 1-bit DAC forced on us by other aspects of the design such as the
very high (96MHz) sample rate?
If not, is it a cost issue, and is it likely to be perceptibly worse (to
some ears) than alternatives?
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Mrs Paula Anne Maddox <paula at synth.net>
wrote:
> I had lots of customers who said 002 sounded more analogue than 008, which
> was odd, but that's people's ears for you.
>
>
> On 23 April 2017, at 05:31, David G Dixon <dixon at mail.ubc.ca> wrote:
>
> > Question on the Novation NCO thing: In the video I saw they
> > are going out of their way to imply without saying directly
> > so that an NCO is somehow more "Analog" than other digital
> > oscillators - is there anything to this?
>
> It's because the sampling rate is 96MHz, or about 2000 times faster than
> your typical digital oscillator, so there is no digital character to the
> output. At least, that's what I got out of it. What I know about digital
> oscillators could be explained in about 96 microseconds.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170423/ed8851e7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list