[sdiy] Hiss, Crackle, and Pop

Pete Hartman pete.hartman at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 01:07:58 CEST 2017


Given that one of the original design goals of c was to make a "high level
assembler" I find this hilarious.  Yes, forth is closer to the hardware,
but it's at a level not needed by 95% of us.

On Apr 4, 2017 5:07 PM, "Gordonjcp" <gordonjcp at gjcp.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:02:42AM -0700, MTG wrote:
> > That's curious. The reason I got on so well with C was because it
> > was so much like assembly language. Ha ha.
>
> I don't really like C because it's all so abstracted and you can't really
> get at the hardware.  I appreciate that very high level languages have
> their place, and all.  Forth is good, though, I use that a lot.
>
> --
> Gordonjcp MM0YEQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at synth-diy.org
> http://synth-diy.org/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20170404/a2ac197a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Synth-diy mailing list