[sdiy] From a commercial standpoint -- has Eurorack "won"?

Tom Wiltshire tom at electricdruid.net
Tue May 3 00:46:11 CEST 2016

On 2 May 2016, at 23:19, john slee <indigoid at oldcorollas.org> wrote:

> On 3 May 2016 at 07:35, KA4HJH <ka4hjh at gmail.com> wrote:
> What I really don't like about Euro are the tiny knobs and the need for extra panels just to bring out all the desirable jacks on some modules. Modules that are expensive to begin with.
> Yes. This. Doepfer has notably avoided the cramped (relative to the rest of Eurorack) layouts. And quite a lot of his modules are 8hp or wider. In this at least his designs are closer to 5U/Serge than the rest of Eurorack, in that he works on a consistent grid and has a predictable, uniform aesthetic.
> I feel like many of the other manufacturers have missed something important.
> In particular, when their panel designs are so spectacularly illegible that people pay willingly extra money for replacements, something is horribly wrong.

+1 Agree. One side effect of the success of the format is that everyone's had/having a go, and some are *much* better at it than others! Some Eurorack gear is like a crash course in how to do user interface design badly - cramped, illegible, and nonsense when you can read it, illogically laid out, etc etc.

In general, I'd say more synths suffer from too many features than too few. Learning when to stop is crucial!!


More information about the Synth-diy mailing list