[sdiy] Ways for innovation
Gordonjcp
gordonjcp at gjcp.net
Sat Jan 23 10:32:01 CET 2016
I can't quote directly because your email is a big unreadable blob of HTML.
> . No matter how often I try to explain to people that a piece of software cannot recreate a performance on a real instrument, I always have a bunch of people snapping at me...
A piece of software is a real instrument, too. In fact, many modern instruments are "pieces of software" running on dedicated hardware platforms.
I can't recreate the nuances of playing the guitar on a piano, so I use the one that works best for what I'm trying to do. I can't ride my bicycle through metre-deep bogs and over waist-high snowdrifts and I can't drive my Landrover through little forest tracks barely wider than my shoulders. So, I use the most appropriate thing to get me where I want to go.
> they express their unfounded claims about how a digital waveform is that same or "higher resolution" (uh I hate that) than an analog waveform...
When you play back a digital recording, what hits your ears is analogue. Unless it's recorded at a sufficiently low quality that you have significant artifacts below about 8kHz, you cannot hear any difference.
You definitely cannot hear the "steps" in a 16-bit recording, and you definitely cannot hear the slices in anything sampled faster than about 32kHz.
--
Gordonjcp MM0YEQ
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list