[sdiy] passive ring modulator transformers

[Rick Jansen]

Sorry, the mc1496 was used, not the mc1494.

I wonder if a transformer based circuit will work well. It was all they had before 
electronics, but not everything old is better, or even good..

rick

On 17/01/2016 14:55, Simon Brouwer wrote:
> Hi,
> Does the MC1494 have any important advantages compared to the MC1496? It looks difficult
> to get.
> Best regards
> Simon
>
>  > Op 17 januari 2016 om 14:28 schreef Rick Jansen <rick.jansen at xs4all.nl>:
>  >
>  >
>  > In that case the old mc1494 is a candidate too. Elektor's ring modulator is built with it.
>  >
>  > http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/MC1494-D.PDF
>  >
>  > Rick
>  >
>  > > On 17 Jan 2016, at 14:14, Gordonjcp <gordonjcp at gjcp.net> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:26:11PM -0500, alfred.pear at gmail.com wrote:
>  > >> hello SDIYers,
>  > >>
>  > >> i'm currently trying to figure out how to get reasonably affordable
>  > >> transformers for a passive ring modulator.
>  > >
>  > > Why not just make a proper four-quadrant multiplier out of a couple of opamps and an
> LM13700?
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > Gordonjcp MM0YEQ
>  > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > Synth-diy mailing list
>  > > Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>  > > http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Synth-diy mailing list
>  > Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>  > http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>