[sdiy] passive ring modulator transformers
Simon Brouwer
simon.o at brousant.nl
Sun Jan 17 14:55:19 CET 2016
Hi,
Does the MC1494 have any important advantages compared to the MC1496? It looks
difficult to get.
Best regards
Simon
> Op 17 januari 2016 om 14:28 schreef Rick Jansen <rick.jansen at xs4all.nl>:
>
>
> In that case the old mc1494 is a candidate too. Elektor's ring modulator is
> built with it.
>
> http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/MC1494-D.PDF
>
> Rick
>
> > On 17 Jan 2016, at 14:14, Gordonjcp <gordonjcp at gjcp.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:26:11PM -0500, alfred.pear at gmail.com wrote:
> >> hello SDIYers,
> >>
> >> i'm currently trying to figure out how to get reasonably affordable
> >> transformers for a passive ring modulator.
> >
> > Why not just make a proper four-quadrant multiplier out of a couple of
> > opamps and an LM13700?
> >
> > --
> > Gordonjcp MM0YEQ
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Synth-diy mailing list
> > Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> > http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20160117/483f11bc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list