[sdiy] how you got started with your current µC?

Paul Maddox yo at VacoLoco.net
Thu Sep 24 12:47:07 CEST 2015


Have to agree about the arm stuff...
just found a nice thing from freescale - 
http://www.freescale.com/products/arm-processors/kinetis-cortex-m/k-series/k2x-usb-mcus/freescale-freedom-development-platform-for-kinetis-k22-mcus:FRDM-K22F

£19 for an eval board with debugger/programmer and 100Mhz ARM with 
floating point.




On 20/09/2015 06:02, Terry Shultz wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> The ARM Cortex M series are getting a lot of new designs in the 
> embedded space.
>
> Pretty cheap, tools aplenty, and plenty of inexpensive boards and 
> projects. Having been a DSP 56k programmer at Motorola/Freescale for 
> about 28 years,
> I find it fun to be able to use a C compiler and quit programming in 
> assembly all the time.
>
> I have programmed the z-80 at E-Mu, 6808 and 68k at PPG and 6805, 
> 6811, 680x0 and now ARM A and M series, I prefer working with the 
> Cortex M4 and M0 for new audio
> projects. Arduino and Beagleboard are good places to get your chops 
> and tune up.
>
> Proprietary devices are becoming the dinosaurs. The Coldfire devices 
> were actually quite good but doomed when ARM launched Arm 9 and Arm 11 
> then the A series.
>
> Try out the ST, NXP, Freescale Cortex M devices and see if you can get 
> cooking quickly. All have a wide range of cheap platforms to play with.
>
> best always,
>
> Terry Shultz
>> On Sep 19, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Vinicius Brazil <brazil.v at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:brazil.v at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I also ever use my own custom boards.
>>
>> Vincius
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:59 PM, <rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk 
>> <mailto:rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>     I started using dev boards for PICs about 20 years ago for
>>     industrial projects, but these days I usually just go straight to
>>     a first hash of the intended hardware...
>>
>>     When you're just starting out it's nice to have a development
>>     board that guarantees the correct power supply, clock and reset
>>     signals are presented to the processor and a convenient method of
>>     programming, so you don't have to worry about these things.  It
>>     also often provides a few other built-in features too like some
>>     switches, some LEDs, pots, an LCD, RS-232 serial port, CAN port,
>>     USB etc.  However, I quickly realised that for most of the things
>>     I was developing I didn't use half of the things on the dev
>>     boards, and/or the quality of the Microchip dev boards was
>>     actually quite poor.
>>
>>     For instance Microchip's dsPICDem Dev Board only has a crappy
>>     8-bit 8kHz CODEC on board which is fine for telecoms quality
>>     speech but completely useless for pro-audio applications, and
>>     doesn't have proper analogue and digital ground-planes either. 
>>     It also doesn't have MIDI in/out, uses a different LCD to the
>>     industry standard Hitachi alphanumeric standard, etc, and has
>>     really crappy thumbwheel "preset" pots for the analogue inputs
>>     that only last for about 10 turns before wearing out!  For these
>>     reason I usually make my own "dev Board" with just the features I
>>     want on it to help me develop whatever I'm working on at the time.
>>
>>     There's a lot to be said for knocking out the first version of
>>     hardware as early as you can, then you find out about potential
>>     hardware problems and deficiencies as early as possible.  Ground
>>     loops, unwanted noises, LCD glitches, switch bounces, etc... 
>>     Leaving more time to thing about and implement solutions.
>>
>>     -Richie,
>>
>>
>>     On 2015-09-19 22:46, Michael Zacherl wrote:
>>
>>         I got curious:
>>         did you people start with a typical dev-board of
>>         PIC/AVR/STM32/... ?
>>         m.
>>
>>         On 19.Sep 2015, at 21:28 , Richie Burnett
>>         <rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk
>>         <mailto:rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>             No probs here either.
>>
>>             -Richie,
>>
>>             ---- Pete Hartman wrote ----
>>
>>                 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Gordonjcp
>>                 <gordonjcp at gjcp.net <mailto:gordonjcp at gjcp.net>> wrote:
>>
>>                 On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Tom
>>                 Wiltshire wrote:
>>
>>                     I'd probably have to agree. TL07x op-amps would
>>                     be my most used IC. Not very glamorous, but
>>                     they're the glue that holds a million audio
>>                     circuits together.
>>
>>                     Aside from that, PIC uPs for digital, and
>>                     SSM2164/V2164 for analog.
>>
>>
>>                 I've never liked PICs.  They're slow, expensive and
>>                 very hard to develop for, thanks to the sheer lack of
>>                 support - and last time I looked you had to pay extra
>>                 for surface-mount!
>>
>>                 I used AVR for a bit but I'm moving over to STM32 -
>>                 ridiculously cheap and ridiculously fast.
>>
>>                 This must be a personal taste thing, as I have no
>>                 problems at all programming with PICs.  The
>>                 documentation is very good, and there are lots of
>>                 examples to get over the most difficult part which is
>>                 how to set the various switches (in AVR world the
>>                 equivalent is the "fuses").  I've actually had more
>>                 frustration figuring out how to set fuses, to be
>>                 honest.  I haven't played with the STM32s, I'll
>>                 certainly have to give that a try.
>>
>>
>>         --
>>         http://mz.klingt.org <http://mz.klingt.org/>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Synth-diy mailing list
>>         Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl <mailto:Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>>         http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Synth-diy mailing list
>>     Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl <mailto:Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>>     http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl <mailto:Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20150924/e8db727a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Synth-diy mailing list