[sdiy] Productionisation Service for the SDIY community

Nathanael King nate at paperproductsmusic.com
Mon Sep 21 18:49:50 CEST 2015


(One of the) Original post(s) referenced completing circuits like
adding power protection, and other generalized provisions. It just
strikes me as strange that someone would be incapable of completing
his work, but able to complete a product suitable for mass
consumption. We already have enough incomplete modules flooding the
market. Or, if incomplete isn't a suitable word, simply not completely
thought out from an end user perspective. While I understand generic
circuit building blocks might improve a circuit, I feel it's logical
to conclude a designer that does not know or has not taken the steps
to understand why those building blocks are necessary can't have made
necessary adjustments to other parts of the circuit that may not be
glaringly obvious. I was making a separate point from the below. Not
wanting to do a pcb layout is not indicative of being ill-equipped.

And, I hear you on not wanting to do a one-off, it depends on your
specialty. Some are better at the prototype phase whereas others are
better at the computer work phase. I'm a computer work guy, I hate the
breadboard. It's my experience there are already at least a fair
supply of ones willing to lay out a pcb for free or little.

And, for what it's worth, I'm not intending to parade rain, I'm 100%
on board with growing and improving the community by any means
necessary. I just don't like the idea of attempting to non-monetarily
improve or finish the designs of others. It sounds like a bad idea for
the end user, and the one trying to improve the base design.

-- 
Nate King
Paper Products Music



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list