[sdiy] Front panel design philosophies

Declare Update declareupdate at gmail.com
Sun Apr 26 19:54:49 CEST 2015


I'd have to agree that anything closer than 15mm (I use 0.6 inches) is pushing it. 0.6 works great with the various vertical mount jacks I've tried, and keeps patching comfy. I do the whole layout on a 0.6" grid, with pots usually double that. if you use small knobs like davies, pots can go 0.6" from each other too, so long as there is space on the sides to turn them. This allows 7 elements vertically, often 2 pots and 6-8 jacks per 6hp, and I never go under 6hp. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 26, 2015, at 2:08 AM, rsdio at audiobanshee.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 11:49 PM, mskala at ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, rsdio at audiobanshee.com wrote:
>>> What are some common spacings for the 3.5 mm jacks? I searched and found
>>> a comment that one particular person is not happy with the 20 mm spacing
>>> because it is too tight, but that only allows about 6 jacks vertically.
>> 
>> If you want to build a 2HP module and have jacks in it at all, that means
>> 10.16mm horizontal spacing should two such modules be mounted side by
>> side.  It takes careful selection of the jacks because many have bodies
>> wider than that, and you probably wouldn't want to make the vertical
>> spacing equally tight, but it is a thing many designers do, and the market
>> tolerates it.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthew Skala
> 
> Thanks. I hadn't thought about looking at it from the horizontal spacing.
> 
> I do note that Doepfer only seem to have one product that is 2HP (A180-2). Otherwise, 4HP seems to be the minimum. But I guess 4HP would naturally have 20.32 mm spacing, horizontally, which is tight enough that some would complain.
> 
> Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list