[sdiy] On the topic of ring modulation (Using FETs instead of diodes?)
Tom Wiltshire
tom at electricdruid.net
Fri Aug 15 18:06:20 CEST 2014
Ok, ignore this. I've found my answer in the rest of this thread…Thanks, Don
Tom
On 15 Aug 2014, at 17:02, Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2014, at 19:43, Donald Tillman <don at till.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Tom Wiltshire <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps you could try using four precision rectifier circuits in the ring configuration to overcome the diode turn-on threshold. Diode ring modulators usually use germanium diodes for the lower threshold voltage, but with the precision rectifier circuit, you could probably use cheap silicon diodes - 1N4148s or whatever.
>>
>> It wouldn't be a ring modulator.
>>
>> The diode ring modulator depends on the diode nonlinearity, which the precision rectifier circuit doesn't have.
>
> I realise that the non-linearity of the diodes adds distortion to the traditional diode ring mod, but I thought that the distortion was an unavoidable side-effect, not the whole deal. It'd still be a ring modulator even with ideal diodes, wouldn't it? (zero threshold voltage, no nonlinearity at signal levels)
>
> If it would, then a precision rectifier might get you closer to ideal. Ok, it won't sound like a diode ring mod any more, since it won't have the heavy distortion, but it might be a simple/cheap way to get a cleaner ring mod sound like you'd get from a analog multiplier like AD633.
>
> Does anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a workable idea? I can't go and try it right now...
>
> Tom
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list