[sdiy] Discrete OTA

[Dan Snazelle]

and he posts ALL of the new EN he writes straight to the web site 

i bought the entire EN back about 6 yrs ago and it was one of the best purchases i ever made !

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:20 AM, "Pete Hartman" <pete.hartman at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Bernie still makes the dead tree version available to all comers for a
> very reasonable cost, and scans things periodically and posts them as
> well.  I had a query about an article Thomas Henry had cited and he
> went to the trouble of scanning it and putting it up without batting
> an eyelash.  Given the expense it would take to have a well-scanned
> complete Electronotes available on the web, and the fact that a lot of
> the core concepts *are* scanned and available, I think he's found a
> reasonable middle ground.
> 
> It's fair to note as well that reading Electronotes still takes some
> effort on the part of the reader.  So the sorts of folks who want
> everything handed to them and who might just scan and put up other
> people's work seem less likely to go grab Electronotes that for that
> purpose.
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Mattias Rickardsson <mr at analogue.org> wrote:
>>> On 10 April 2014 07:14, Dan Snazelle <subjectivity at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> i suppose information was VERY hard to come by in the 70s ( except for electronotes )
>> 
>> Funnily, today it's the other way around - Electronotes is almost the
>> only synth information you *cannot* find readily available on the web.
>> At least I haven't been able to find it leaked anywhere yet, which is
>> kind of amazing. Most other synth constructions, or info about them,
>> can be found quickly. :-)
>> 
>> /mr
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 10 April 2014 07:14, Dan Snazelle <subjectivity at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> this:
>>> 
>>> "Well I think the times of generous schematics/ideas sharing are gone."
>>> 
>>> is really sad....
>>> 
>>> unless he just means for himself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> i mean granted, all the ideas you could ever need to get going in SDIY are out there but id just hate to see the general growth of synth entrepreneurs mean the good general circuit discussion dies off
>>> 
>>> in ians case i understand as most of his designs are very IP intensive
>>> 
>>> 
>>> but i fear soon every builder with 5 opamps on a perfboard will be protecting their trade secrets.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> i suppose information was VERY hard to come by in the 70s ( except for electronotes )
>>> 
>>> interesting thread
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:14 AM, "Roman Sowa" <modular at go2.pl> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Well I think the times of generous schematics/ideas sharing are gone.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy