[sdiy] Discrete OTA

[Tom Bugs]

"

Why does the fact that something is potted or not make such a difference?


Presumably that potting is a manual ball-ache for 'proper' manufacturing.

On 03/04/2014 22:42, Tom Wiltshire wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2014, at 22:18, David G Dixon <dixon at mail.ubc.ca> wrote:
>
>>> I'm sure the only reason for that is that Damian is still
>>> very curious about my OTA and I haven't told him how it works...
>> I've been reading this thread (and responding) with interest all week.  I
>> have one more comment on the original topic:
>>
>> For 5 or 6 pounds ($8 to $10), that discrete OTA had better be absolutely
>> the most amazing thing ever, because the current industry standard, LM13700,
>> provides two OTAs in one package and can be had for about $0.3 in bulk, and
>> is available in both SMD and through-hole formats.
>>
>> I think that the market for such a thing is probably microscopic.  Module
>> manufacturers are not going to buy it because it is too expensive, too
>> large, the OTA function is well covered by cheap, widely available chips and
>> the advantage of a discrete OTA circuit is debatable, potted circuits are a
>> pain, and installing potted circuits would have to be done by hand and may
>> thus add significantly to the manufacturering cost.
>>
>> Now, a non-potted discrete circuit consisting of SMD parts on a tiny little
>> board with pin headers (like Intellijel's picoVCA, three of which can be
>> found plugged into the back of every Linix hex VCA module) might be popular,
>> but you wouldn't be able to get much for it.
> Why does the fact that something is potted or not make such a difference? I'm just curious. He's talking about a small SMD potted module, and you think that's not likely to succeed, but an unpotted one might? Or did I misunderstand you?
>
> I can see good reasons for something potted being better - more robust, better protection from the environment, more thermally stable and consistent, etc. What are the advantages of "no potting" beyond "repairability" (which should be a once in twenty years thing if it's done right).
>
> Either way, I basically agree that the market for a discrete OTA is tiny. If I wanted an OTA, I'd use a 13700, and I don't want an OTA because the S/N ratio they manage is poor by comparison with competing options like the THAT VCAs or the 2164. Any new OTA product has to be better than a linearised 2164 or there isn't much point.
>
> 2 cents, and only one person's view,
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>

-- 
BugBrand LTD
UK company No. 07199808
VAT No. GB 988 2629 57
1 Ninetree Hill
BRISTOL BS1 3SB
United Kingdom
www.bugbrand.co.uk