[sdiy] Squabbling (was Re: [WTB] IR3R01 in UK)

[Dan Snazelle]

i agree that scammers hurt our community

but maybe we should have a thread for that

 (a bad trader thread )


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:24 PM, "Pete Hartman" <pete.hartman at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Are you really attacking me for having a different opinion than you?
> 
> I don't understand how it is you suddenly are giving me the "if you're
> not with us, you're with Laboratory of Sound" attack treatment.
> 
> 
> Message is received: Laboratory of Sound has been a bad actor in a
> transaction with Bob, a respected long time contributor and someone
> who has an important and useful innovation for this audience.
> 
> If this were someone discussing a commercial transaction with LoS,
> that would totally be relevant.  But attacking him continuously and
> indiscriminately just raises the noise floor.
> 
> It's not indifferent to say act like an adult and don't try to pick a
> fight in every thread.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:07 PM, cheater00 . <cheater00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4 Oct 2013 00:00, "Pete Hartman" <pete.hartman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think it's obnoxious.  Popping up in a couple of threads has
>>> highlighted the allegations against Laboratory of Sound. I don't have
>>> any reason to doubt Bob's version of events, but I don't think it's
>>> remotely relevant, and as we saw here, it starts casting aspersions on
>>> innocent parties.
>> 
>> We can just forget what's important and focus on Bob's inability to use the
>> computer, or we can show some solidarity. I don't know why supporting the
>> right side and shunning scammers hurting our community is "not remotely
>> relevant" but maybe you can tell me. Since when is such extreme indifference
>> something to be proud of?
>> 
>> D.
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy