[sdiy] Schmitz ADSR replace pots with CV control?

[Mattias Rickardsson]

On 26 November 2013 10:58, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Den 25 nov 2013 22:17 skrev "David G Dixon" <dixon at mail.ubc.ca>:
>>>>
>>>> No, a single 2164 would do nicely, with one VCA to spare.  The response
>>>> would be exponential, as it should be for an envelope.
>
> Or one 2164 gain cell and a dual mux:
> http://www.sowa.synth.net/modular/vcaddsr.html

Yes, but that's a completely different env gen design, compared to
Schmitz' 555-based one that was subject to CV-ification. :-)

> oooh.... Roman's back!!!

Yes, hooray!

/mr