[sdiy] IC socket reliability
Richie Burnett
rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk
Sun Jan 20 19:48:19 CET 2013
Definitely specify turned-pin if you anticipate more than a handful of
device insertion and removal operations. The cheapo folded sprung metal IC
sockets quickly loose their springiness after a few insertions and bad
connections start to show up!
I don't have any MTBF failures or anything at hand but I'd think that
datasheets for example parts should be able to quantify reliability
benefits.
(In general I try to avoid any un-necessary electrical connectors in
anything I design, and would solder directly to the PCB unless it was
something like an EEPROM where you anticipate removing and refitting as part
of the life cycle. In my experience it is usually connectors that cause
reliability problems with age (surface oxidation), vibration, or at extremes
of temperature and humidity.)
-Richie,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Kendall" <davekendall at ntlworld.com>
To: "Synth DIY List" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 6:30 PM
Subject: [sdiy] IC socket reliability
> Hi all.
>
> Are turned-pin IC sockets *much* more reliable than the regular double
> sprung flat-plate type, and is the type of plating important?
> IIRC, good things have been said about AMP Diplomate sockets (not
> turned-pin) for production use.
>
> Anybody have any experiences they'd like to share?
>
> cheers,
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list