[sdiy] TT-303 specs

Adam Inglis 21pointy at tpg.com.au
Tue Feb 12 21:20:44 CET 2013


It is clearly functionally and cosmetically a direct imitation of a  
Roland product. I have no legal qualifications but one would think a  
case could be made!
Perhaps the fact that the original has been out of production for over  
30 years makes it possible?

Adam
On 13/02/2013, at 4:47 AM, David Bulog wrote:

> No midi CCs and Roland would lose if it ever got to court--despite  
> enclose looking the same (ts not a fake TB-303 with Roland written  
> on it
>
> The TT-303 sequencer and firmware is different  than the TB-303s
> I think the only way Cyclones operation can unfold is QA issues and  
> factories they use and if it came to light that the factory was a  
> sweatshop no one would want to buy the product no mater how good it  
> was
>
> Here is an example of where a C & D order should be used
> http://www.stihl.co.nz/beware-of-dangerous-fakes.aspx
>
> david
>
>
>
> On 13/02/2013, at 3:47 AM, rburnett at richieburnett.co.uk wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if this sends and receives MIDI CCs relating to  
>> the rotary control positions?
>>
>> http://www.x0xclones.com/review-cyclone-analogic-bass-bot-tt-303/
>>
>> Also, a little suprised that Roland haven't hit them with a C&D  
>> order for that copying of function, enclosure and livery!!! :-O
>>
>> -Richie,
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list